RISA CROMER
  • home
  • about
  • c.v.
  • research
    • Conceiving Christian America
    • Reproductive Righteousness
    • Doctoring Dobbs
  • teaching
  • engagement
  • contact

4S News - Going to NOLA in September!

3/22/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture
Just got word that the double-panel I helped organize for 4S (Society for the Social Studies of Science) was accepted! Here's a preview of what's on deck:

Panel Title: Capitalizing Fertility: Feminist STS Approaches to Reproductive Bioeconomies

Key Participants: Session Organizers: Risa Cromer, Purdue University; Lucy van de Wiel, University of Cambridge; Polina Vlasenko, Indiana University

Discussants: Diane Tober, University of California, San Francisco; Charlotte Kroløkke, University of Southern Denmark

Chair: Janelle Lamoreaux, University of Arizona
Panel Description: Feminist STS and medical anthropology scholars of the past three decades have offered innovative theorizations of the entanglements between capitalism and reproductive and regenerative technologies. These technologies--from surrogacy to embryo “adoption,” gamete vending to cord blood banking, placenta exchanges to uterine transplants, and gene testing to gene editing--have much to tell us about how contemporary bioeconomies work. Scholars in this tradition have contributed to the proliferation of “bio-concepts” that draw critical attention to the political economies involved in shaping clinical, institutional, social, geopolitical, and cultural practices of assisted reproduction and social life more broadly. Taking the capitalizing practices that steer the global fertility sector as an object of inquiry, this panel uses, critiques, expands, and contextualizes this range of bio-concepts within the context of reproductive technologies. Drawing upon research from across the globe, this double panel addresses core themes: how centering economic analyses in scholarship on reproductive technologies and bio-exchanges interrupt and generate new understandings of late capitalism; which methods and disciplinary perspectives help to foreground configurations of value and power; and what opportunities exist for amplifying political economy analyses in STS scholarship. Together, these papers provide a critical take on what political economy contributes to long-standing feminist STS concerns with the imbrications of capital, reproduction, and technology.

Here's a preview of the paper I will be delivering that examines the Christian logics that propel reproductive remainders around the globe:

Paper Title: Sacred Assets: Christian Logics of Reproductive Remainder Economies
Paper Abstract: Frozen human embryos leftover from in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures have become a favorite example among science and technology studies scholars and medical anthropologists theorizing what happens at the junctures of capitalism, reproductive medicine, and biotechnologies. A range of “bio-concepts” have flourished in recent years to explain the role of capitalist logics in circulating and valuing entities like embryos within global markets. Despite some observations of Christian discourses within contemporary bioeconomies (e.g. rhetoric of salvation), few scholars in this tradition have addressed Christianity as a constitutive ingredient shaping the U.S. tissue trade. Drawing on ethnographic research (2008-2018) in the United States within programs that manage frozen embryos, including a premier biobank for human embryonic stem cell research and the world’s first “embryo adoption” program establish ed by evangelical Christians, this paper offers a reconsideration of feminist scholarship on bioeconomies by putting Christian logics at the center of analysis. Determining where embryos belong categorically and practically has inspired new forms of expertise, discourses, and practices through which these opposing groups came to share deep commitments to regeneration—a revaluing process of severing embryos from their past relations and redirecting their potentialities toward new futures. By examining the secularized and explicit Christian logics that subtend both practices, this paper contributes to a growing body of literature about the challenges of valuing potential—an increasingly common phenomenon within societies shaped by speculative forms of capitalism and Christianity.

0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    May 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    April 2022
    January 2022
    November 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    November 2020
    September 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    November 2019
    September 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

  • home
  • about
  • c.v.
  • research
    • Conceiving Christian America
    • Reproductive Righteousness
    • Doctoring Dobbs
  • teaching
  • engagement
  • contact